Cases 1 - 10 of 104
Odraye Jones v. Margaret Bradshaw
as 24-3581
Respondent:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Petitioner:
ODRAYE G. JONES, nka Malik Allah-U-Akbar
Juan Kinley v. Margaret Bradshaw
as 23-3847
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUAN A. KINLEY and JUAN ANTONIO LAMAR KINLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Abraham Yaacov v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 22-3294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABRAHAM YAACOV
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, MIKE DAVIS, Religious Services Administrator, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, Richland Correctional Institution and others
Clarence Mack v. Margaret Bradshaw

as 22-3201
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLARENCE MACK
Respondent / Appellee:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
John Cody v. Karen Slusher, et al
as 19-3680
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER KAREN SLUSHER, CORRECTIONS OFFICER KIMBERLY MOSIER, SHEILA JORDAN, A.D.A. Assistant and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CODY, aka Bobby Thompson
Odraye Jones v. Margaret Bradshaw
as 19-3611
Petitioner / Appellant:
ODRAYE G. JONES, nka Malik Allah-U-Akbar
Respondent / Appellee:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
In re: Odraye Jones
as 19-3498
Petitioner:
In re: ODRAYE G. JONES, nka Malik Allah-U-Akbar
Respondent:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Ian Davis v. Margaret Bradshaw

as 17-3262
Petitioner - Appellant:
IAN R. DAVIS, aka Benson Davis
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Abraham Yaacov v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 16-4361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABRAHAM YAACOV
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, MIKE DAVIS, Religious Services Administrator, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden, Richland Correctional Institution and others
James Liso v. Margaret Bradshaw
as 16-3866
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES A. LISO
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARET BRADSHAW, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.