Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lott v. Barfield et al
as 6:2024cv05341
Defendant:
Eric Ramos, Ron Lawrenz, Diana Barfield and others
Plaintiff:
Mark T Lott, Mark Tillman Lott and Mark Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01091
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lott v. Gaines
as 6:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Mark T Lott, Mark Lott and Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Jeremy Gains and Jeremy Gaines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lott v. Wellpath Recovery Solutions
as 6:2023cv00728
Plaintiff:
Mark Lott, Mark T Lott and Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Wellpath Recovery Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lott v. Dube et al
as 6:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Mark T Lott, Mark Lott and Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Dr. Michelle Dube, Eric Ramos, Ron Lawrenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lott v. Sticks From the Yard Inc
as 3:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Mark T Lott and Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Sticks From the Yard Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lott v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 6:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
Mark Lott and Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Lott v. Holly Scaturo
as 14-7183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK LOTT, a/k/a Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLLY SCATURO, SVPTP Director
Lott v. Bradshaw et al
as 2:2012cv01190
Plaintiff:
Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Linda Bradshaw, Kenneth Sharp and Kevin Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
