Cases 1 - 10 of 33
CAMPBELL, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04791
Plaintiff:
MARK J CAMPBELL, JR.
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
CAMPBELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
MARK D CAMPBELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. The People of the State of Florida et al
as 6:2022cv01362
In Re:
Sherma Samantha Johnson El
Plaintiff:
Sherma Samantha Johnson
Defendant:
The People of the State of Florida, Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Palm Bay Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Vaughan v. Campbell
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Vaughan
Defendant:
Mark William Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Campbell v. Pfister
as 1:2020cv01062
Petitioner:
Mark B Campbell
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Respondent:
Randy Pfister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mark A. Campbell v. Kevin Kallas, et al
as 18-2075
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARK A. CAMPBELL, also known as Nicole Rose Campbell
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN KALLAS, RYAN HOLTZMACHER, JAMES GREER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
