Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carlisle v. LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01418
Plaintiff:
Sam Carlisle
Defendant:
LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc., Richard Moscicki, Leon Chen and others
Wilhelm v. LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09186
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc., Richard Moscicki, Leon Chen and others
Bushansky v. LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09145
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
LogicBio Therapeutics, Inc., Mark Enyedy, J. Jeffrey Goater and others
Kay v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2016cv00760
Plaintiff:
Mark Kay
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson, et al v. Cemex, et al
as 15-4097
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KELLY T. ANDERSON, DEAN A. BAILEY, ARYON E. BAKER, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CEMEX, INC. and SALARIED EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY
Anderson, et al v. Cemex, et al
as 15-4054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELLY T. ANDERSON, DEAN A. BAILEY, ARYON E. BAKER, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CEMEX, INC. and SALARIED EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY
Anderson, et al v. Cemex, et al
as 15-4044
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KELLY T. ANDERSON, DEAN A. BAILEY, ARYON E. BAKER, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CEMEX, INC. and SALARIED EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN OF SOUTHWESTERN PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01243
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Anderson et al v. Cemex et al
as 2:2012cv00136
Plaintiff:
Kelly T. Anderson , Dean A. Bailey , Aryon E. Baker, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Cemex and Salaried Employees' Retirement Plan of Southwestern Portland Cement
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
