Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Ronald Dandar v. Mark Krysevig, et al
as 12-2971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK KRYSEVIG, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 12-2238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Amicus - Appellee:
N. G. BARTLEY
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 11-1229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 10-4434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Ronald Dandar v. Mark Krysevig, et al
as 10-3052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK KRYSEVIG, DA ERIE CTY and ATTY GEN PA
Ronald Dandar v. Mark Krysevig, et al
as 10-1537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK KRYSEVIG, DA ERIE CTY and ATTY GEN PA
Ronald Dandar v. Mark Krysevig, et al
as 09-4381
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK KRYSEVIG, BRADLEY H. FOULK and ATTY GEN PA
Ronald Dandar v. Mark Krysevig, et al
as 09-4382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD G. DANDAR
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK KRYSEVIG, BRADLEY H. FOULK and ATTY GEN PA
In re: Ronald Dandar, et al
as 09-3949
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: RONALD G. DANDAR
Defendant - Respondent:
MARK KRYSEVIG, BRADLEY H. FOULK and ATTY GEN PA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
SEAN J MCLAUGHLIN, Honorable
David Wilson v. Sharon Burks, et al
as 09-2827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PEPE WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON BURKS, MARK KRYSEVIG, Superintendent of SCI Cresson and KRISTEN P. REISINGER, Chief Grievance Officer, Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
