Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Levy v. Riebel
as 3:2022cv01539
Plaintiff:
Mark Levy
Defendant:
Nicholas Riebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01618
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levis v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2019cv02183
Plaintiff:
Mark Levis
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weil v. Mark D. Levy Horticultural Services, LLC et al
as 7:2019cv04493
Defendant:
Mark Levy, Jr., Mark Levy,Sr. and Mark D. Levy Horticultural Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Matthew Weil
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Levy et al v. DePuy Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00302
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon A Levy and Mark Levy
Special Master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11776
Plaintiff:
Eugene LoIacono Jr., Rita Kaplan, Yuland Lathuillerie and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
LEVY et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02040
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD
Plaintiff:
MARK LEVY and NICOLE LEVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASSELL v. LEVY et al
as 2:2017cv05508
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL CASSELL
Defendant:
MARK LEVY , U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , KML LAW GROUP, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEVY v. SANCHEZ
as 2:2017cv04329
Plaintiff:
MARK LEVY
Defendant:
KAREN SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levy v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02134
Plaintiff:
Mark Levy
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. , Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
