Cases 121 - 130 of 418
Jihad Hossein v. Dearborn Heights, City of, et al
as 13-1179
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, DAVID D. TURFE, District Court Chief Judge, MARK J. PLAWECKI, District Court Judge
and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIHAD HOSSEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2013cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DENG et al v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
YIJUN DENG , HENG XU
Defendant:
JANET A. NAPOLITANO, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR., ROBERT S. MUELLER, III
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
QIAO v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 1:2013cv00124
Defendant:
DIANA WOLDER, MARK HAZUDA, ERIC HIMPTON HOLDER, JR.
and others
Plaintiff:
DONGCHUN QIAO , LAIGANG SONG
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 8:2013cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: Defend. Denial of Pla. Appl. Alien Employment Cert
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 2:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
Arek Fressadi, Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Linda Bentley, Taser International Incorporated, Ian Cordwell
and others
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Fressadi et al v. Powell et al
as 4:2012cv00876
Defendant:
Moyes Sellers and Sims Limited, Lasota and Peters PLC, Sims Murray Limited
and others
Plaintiff:
Arek Fressadi, Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Hossein v. Deaborn Heights, City of et al

as 2:2012cv14969
Defendant:
M. Guzowski, John Doe, Deaborn Heights, City of
and others
Plaintiff:
Jihad Hossein
Hossein v. Dearborn Heights, City of et al

as 2:2012cv14968
Defendant:
M Guzowski, Doe, Dearborn Heights, City of
and others
Plaintiff:
Jihad Hossein
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01790
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.