Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Henson v. Neal et al
as 3:2019cv00396
Defendant:
Erin Jones, Marion Thatcher, Mark Newkirk and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy G Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ganus v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00928
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Bessie Leonard, Kimberly Creasy and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas R Ganus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimbrough v. Thompson et al
as 3:2018cv00887
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Kimbrough, III
Defendant:
Wexford of Indiana LLC, Robert Carter, Nancy Marthakis and others
Undetermined:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2018cv00803
Defendant:
Amy Eichmeier, Matt Leohr, Andrew Pazera and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doll v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00299
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Doll
Defendant:
Ronald Neal, J Wallen and Mark Newkirk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor Jr v. Indiana State Prison et al
as 3:2018cv00199
Defendant:
Indiana State Prison, Mark Newkirk and Mr Pyane
Plaintiff:
Leonard Taylor, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURNETT v. NEAL et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Defendant:
DEBBIE ABRAM, PAM BANE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
DARYL KEITH BURNETT, JR.
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoglund v. Carter et al
as 3:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Keith Hoglund
Defendant:
Robert E Carter, Jr, Ron Neal, Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pannell v. Neal et al
as 3:2017cv00723
Plaintiff:
David Pannell
Defendant:
Ron Neal , Jason Nowatzke , Mark Newkirk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leonard Thomas v. Nicholas Wardell, et al
as 17-2680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
NICHOLAS P. WARDELL, Psychologist, Westville Control Unit, MARK R. SEVIER, Superintendent, MARK NEWKIRK, Classification Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
