Cases
Mark Serafinn v. International Brotherhood of T, et al
as 09-3292
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK SERAFINN
Defendant - Appellee: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 722, STEVEN MONGAN and JOINT COUNCIL 65 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, INTERNATIONAL UNION
Mark Serafinn v. International Brotherhood of T
as 09-3142
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARK SERAFINN
Defendant - Appellant: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 722
Mark Serafinn v. International Brotherhood of T, et al
as 09-2266
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK SERAFINN
Defendant - Appellee: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 722, STEVEN MONGAN, individually and in his capacity as President of Local 722 and JOINT COUNCIL 65 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, INTERNATIONAL UNION
Mark Serafinn v. International Brotherhood of T
as 09-2253
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARK SERAFINN
Defendant - Appellant: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 722
Mark Serafinn v. International Brotherhood of T, et al
as 08-1128
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARK SERAFINN
Defendant - Appellee: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 722, STEVEN MONGAN, individually and in his capacity as President of Local 722 and JOINT COUNCIL 65 OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, INTERNATIONAL UNION
Mark Serafinn v. International Brotherhood 722 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1114
Plaintiff - Appellee: MARK SERAFINN
Defendant - Appellant: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 722
Serafinn et al v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 722
as 1:2007cv04399
Plaintiff: Mark Serafinn, Mark Serafinn, Robin Potter and others
Defendant: International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 722
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?