Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sliwinski v. CEO IC Solutions et al
as 6:2024cv00047
Defendant:
Al Marsh, CEO IC Solutions, Brian Gootkin and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Emil Sliwinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butte Native Wellness Center v. RSUI Indemnity Company et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Butte Native Wellness Center
Defendant:
RSUI Indemnity Company, Kyle W. Dunton, Marsh & McLennan Agency, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Marsh v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Petitioner:
Joseph Wayne Marsh
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Talcott et al v. Marsh & McLennon Agency, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00101
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Talcott, Linda K. Caricaburu, James Talcott Construction, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Marsh & McLennon Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hare v. Billings Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
Albert Hare
Defendant:
Billings Police Department, Officer Solorio and Charlee Marsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Great Western Bank v. Pro Tank Products et al
as 4:2016cv00094
Plaintiff:
Great Western Bank
Defendant:
Pro Tank Products, Todd J. Marsh, Marsh Land and Livestock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. Opportunity Bank, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Steve Kelly
Defendant:
Opportunity Bank, Inc. and April Marsh
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Carlson v. USA
as 4:2013cv00085
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Denise Marsh Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carlson v. USA
as 4:2012cv00010
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Denise Marsh Carlson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DeMaio et al v. Weitzeil et al
as 1:2011cv00056
Plaintiff:
Victor DeMaio and Don Tangwall
Defendant:
Woodrow Weitzeil , Kent Sipe , Shawn Lesnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
