Cases 71 - 80 of 112
Sivak v. Schroeder, et al.
as 25-1217
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Gordon v. Olguin, et al.
as 25-1190
Plaintiff:
CARL GORDON
Defendant:
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, DISTRICT JUDGE, U.S. District Judge, in his individual capacity, MARGO A. ROCCONI, MAGISTRATE JUDGE, MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, U.S. Ciricuit Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuirt, in his individual capacity and others
Sivak v. Schroeder, et al.
as 25-1199
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Schroeder, et al.
as 25-1149
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Schroeder, et al.
as 25-1145
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Schroeder, et al.
as 25-1148
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Schroeder, et al.
as 25-1146
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Schroeder, et al.
as 25-1127
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Schroeder, et al.
as 25-1128
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sivak v. Schroeder, et al.
as 25-1135
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
MARY M. SCHROEDER, CIRCUIT JUDGE, MILAN D. SMITH, JR., CIRCUIT JUDGE and ANDREW D. HURWITZ, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
