Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2018cv01701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2018cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GRIMES v. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE et al

as 1:2017cv01387
Plaintiff:
JEROME L. GRIMES
Defendant:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE and SPRINGFIELD HOSPITAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doreen Shing v. MD Developmental Disabilitie

as 17-1579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOREEN SHING and MAY SHING
Defendant - Appellee:
MD DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ADMINISTRATION, MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE and BUDGET AND EXPENDITURES DIRECTOR
Hesman Tall v. Maryland Developmental

as 17-1066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HESMAN TALL
Defendant - Appellee:
MARYLAND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ADMINISTRATION and MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 16-1952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2016cv01795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doreen Shing v. MD Developmental Disabilitie

as 16-1467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOREEN SHING
Plaintiff:
MAY SHING
Defendant - Appellee:
MD DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ADMINISTRATION and MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE
Tall v. Maryland Developmental Disabilities Administration et al

as 1:2015cv03811
Plaintiff:
Hesman Tall
Defendant:
Maryland Developmental Disabilities Administration and Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant

as 1:2015cv01796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.