Cases 1 - 10 of 12
KAUFMAN LYNN CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. Proton Builders, LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82544
Plaintiff:
KAUFMAN LYNN CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
Proton Builders, LLC, Andreas Poschl, Pablo De Sales and others
HERRERA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv91697
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICIO HERRERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torres et al. v. Sanchez et al.
as 1:2019cv09357
Plaintiff:
Rafael Acero Torres, Kapalejayo Inc., Mario Rafael Pancracio Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Dilia Margarita Baez and Jairo Enrique Sanchez
Herrera Bernal v. Palacio
as 0:2018cv61152
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
Palacio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera Bernal v. Cohen et al
as 0:2018cv61060
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
Paul Cohen, Director of DEA in Weston, Donald Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera Bernal v. Cabrera et al
as 0:2018cv60861
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
Roger Cabrera, Eliana Garcia, Coffey Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera Bernal v. Wells et al
as 1:2018cv21397
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
James Wells, Katerine Lopez, Bruce D. Raticoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera Bernal v. Davis et al
as 0:2017cv62354
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
Dameka L. Davis and Deppeltier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera Bernal v. Canty et al
as 0:2017cv62286
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
Jamila Z. Canty, Eduardo Baldisieso Bascope, Andrew Matthew Coffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera Bernal et al v. Issac et al
as 0:2017cv62285
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
Xo Issac, Eduardo Baldiviaso Bascopa, Karen C. Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
