Cases 1 - 10 of 849
Kremer v. Webador.com et al
as 2:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Maxwell Kremer
Defendant:
Webador.com and Stripe.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Antitrust
DEVLIN v. Wormuth
as 1:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
MAXWELL A DEVLIN
Defendant:
HON Christine E Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States v. Charleton Maxwell
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Charleton Everett Maxwell
Kline v. National Gas & Electric, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Kline
Defendant:
National Gas & Electric, LLC, Todd Gibson, Keith Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Garcia-Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-767
Petitioner:
JERRY JONATHAN GARCIA-LOPEZ, ADARIS YAMILETH ESTRADA DARRAYO and MAXWELL SNEIJDER GARCIA ESTRADA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Giuffre v. Maxwell
as 24-203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE
Appellee:
JOHN DOE 17 and JOHN DOE 73
Defendant / Appellee:
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Respondent:
SHARON CHURCHER and JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Intervenor:
ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ, MICHAEL CERNOVICH, JULIE BROWN and others
Giuffre v. Maxwell
as 24-182
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE
Intervenor:
JULIE BROWN, MIAMI HERALD MEDIA COMPANY, TGP COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and others
Appellee:
JOHN DOE 17 and JOHN DOE 73
Defendant / Appellee:
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Respondent:
SHARON CHURCHER and JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
