Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Smith v. Lebough et al
as 1:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Dayomic Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
Larry Lebough, Lt. Charles Armstrong, Sheila Heard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
McCalvin v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 9:2021cv82393
Plaintiff:
John McCalvin
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline (America) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeffery Walton v. Doaks-Robertson, et al
as 19-5714
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, TDOC Commissioner, DAVID SEXTON, Warden, TDOC Assistant Commissioner of Prisons, NURSE FNU MCCALVIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY WALTON
Bass v. Taylor et al
as 1:2018cv01237
Defendant:
County Mayor Jimmy Sain, Dr. Larry Bloomingburg, Nicole Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Perez D. Bass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCalvin v. Stephens Rock & Dirt, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04908
Defendant:
Stephens Rock & Dirt, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James McCalvin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Walton v. Doaks-Robertson et al
as 1:2018cv01176
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Nurse Practitioner FNU Doaks-Robertson, Assistant Warden FNU Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blount v. Sgt. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00852
Plaintiff:
Derek Blount
Defendant:
Officer McCalvin and Sgt. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAILE v. MCCALVIN et al
as 4:2017cv00460
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAILE
Defendant:
MCCALVIN, HALL, JENKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCalvin et al v. Condor Capital Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv02481
Plaintiff:
Tara McCalvin and Ansari Abdullah
Defendant:
Condor Capital Corporation and Condor Securitization Trust
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
McCalvin et al v. Condor Capital Corporation et al
as 3:2017mc00070
Plaintiff:
Tara McCalvin and Ansari Abdullah
Defendant:
Condor Capital Corporation and Condor Securitization Trust
Movant:
CFAM Financial Services, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
