Cases 1 - 10 of 636
Godun, et al. v. Justanswer LLC
as 24-2095
Plaintiff:
KSENIYA GODUN, MOYA MCDOWELL, RENEE PETTIT and others
Defendant:
JUSTANSWER LLC
Van Druten v. McDowell
as 24-1800
Petitioner:
JOHN JAMES VAN DRUTEN
Respondent:
NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden, Ironwood State Prison
McDowell v. Planet Fitness Staff
as 24-1643
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MAURICE MCDOWELL
Defendant:
PLANET FITNESS STAFF, of 13119 Hawthorne Blvd, Hawthorne, California 90250
Christopher Maurice McDowell v. Planet Fitness Staff
as 2:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice McDowell
Defendant:
Planet Fitness Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald Dale Bennett v. Neil McDowell
as 5:2024cv00046
Petitioner:
Ronald Dale Bennett
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manuel Ortega et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2023cv02636
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosas, Manuel Ortega, Ricardo Rosas and others
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kathleen Allison, Warden Neil McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilberto L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10657
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilbert L. Gonzalez v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2023cv10564
Petitioner:
Gilberto L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. McDowell
as 23-3992
Petitioner / Appellant:
HUMBERTO GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
NEIL MCDOWELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
