Cases 1 - 10 of 1,016
McDowell v. Plymouth Township Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11029
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene McDowell
Defendant:
Plymouth Township Police Department, Plymouth Township Police Department, Commissioner of, Plymouth Township Police Department, Chief of and others
McKinny v. McDowell et al
as 1:2024cv01132
Plaintiff:
James McKinney
Defendant:
N McDowell and T Brandmeyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Haar v. McDowell
as 1:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Jeremy Martin Haar
Respondent:
Nicole McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miles v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Nancy Stacken, Courtney Menton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kashika Speed v. Kevin Thompson
as 24-6236
Plaintiff:
KASHIKA SPEED
Defendant:
KEVIN THOMPSON, Health Services Administrator, FCI McDowell, RN WALTON, and and WARDEN C. MARUKA, FCI McDowell
McDowell v. CHS TX Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Delbert R McDowell
Defendant:
CHS TX Inc doing business as YesCare and Susanne S Levene MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDowell v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10382
Plaintiff:
Danny Eugene McDowell, Danny E. McDowell and Danny McDowell
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Robert Dunlap and John Doe
Stutler v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Aric Stutler
Respondent:
FCI McDowell and E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stutler v. FCI McDowell
as 3:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Aric Stutler
Respondent:
FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
