Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MCGILL v. WAKE COUNTY
as 1:2024cv00867
Defendant:
WAKE COUNTY
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GRIFFITH MCGILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1662
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MCGILL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2024cv00447
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner:
MELISSA GRIFFITH MCGILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020cv01788
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020at00872
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alred et al v. Preferred Compounding Corp et al
as 1:2019cv01563
Plaintiff:
Ricky Kilgore, Carson Williams Davis, Treavor Biggers and others
Defendant:
Preferred Compounding Corp and Charles Michael Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Charles Miller v. M. Adonis, et al
as 17-16176
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES ANDERSON MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ADONIS, MELISSA GRIFFITH, A. GUTIERREZ and others
Phyliss Murphy et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08286
Plaintiff:
Connie Andringa, Jacquelyn Barnes-Buttrum, Chanessa Bowyer and others
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Does and McKesson Corporation
Phyliss Murphy et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv02210
Plaintiff:
Connie Andringa, Jacquelyn Barnes-Buttrum, Chanessa Bowyer and others
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Does and McKesson Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
