Cases 1 - 10 of 546
Martha Ramos Perez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 25-1094
Petitioner:
Martha Celestina Ramos Perez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan v. Merrick B. Garland
as 25-1049
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
MOHAMED IBRAHIM HASSAN
Jose Ramirez Cruz v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 25-1062
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Patrick Lechleitner, Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ramirez Cruz
Martin Manuel Mier Ortega v. Merrick B. Garland
as 25-1008
Petitioner:
MARTIN MANUEL MIER ORTEGA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Pablo Zarate-Gonzalez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-3338
Petitioner:
PABLO ZARATE-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Nyynkpao Banyee v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-3590
Petitioner:
Nyynkpao Banyee
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Dania Martinez-Martinez, et al v. Pamela J. Bondi
as 24-3281
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States and PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
DANIA Y. MARTINEZ-MARTINEZ and E. Y. R.M.
Seidi Maricela Serpas-Villalobos, et al v. Pamela J. Bondi
as 24-3264
Petitioner:
K. D. M.-S., a minor, SEIDI MARICELA SERPAS-VILLALOBOS and J. A. M.-S., a minor
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States and PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General of the United States
Amarjit Singh, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3525
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner:
Dripinder Singh, Amarjit Singh and Manjit Kaur
Guillermo Alvarez-Morales v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-3147
Petitioner:
GUILLERMO ALVAREZ-MORALES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.