Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MFS Series Trust I et al v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al
as 2:2021cv05839
Plaintiff: MFS Series Trust I, MFS Series Trust IV, MFS Series Trust V and others
Defendant: FirstEnergy Corp., Charles E. Jones, Michael Dowling and others
Glicenia Logan v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp, et al
as 20-2940
Defendant / Appellee: Mellon Financial, Dreyfus Investment Advisors, The Vanguard Group and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Glicenia C. Logan
Owens v. FirstEnergy Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv03785
Defendant: K. Jon Taylor, Charles E. Jones, Steven E. Strah and others
Plaintiff: Diane Owens and CalPERS
Petitioner: IRONWORKERS LOCALS 40, 361 & 417 UNION SECURITY FUNDS, The City of Philadelphia Board of Pensions and Retirement, Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Association and others
Interested Party: Partners for Progress Inc., MFS Heritage Trust Company, MFS Investment Management Company (LUX), S.a.r.l and others
Special Master: Shawn K Judge
Logan v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02088
Defendant: Wesley W. Von Schack, Thomas P. Gibbons, J. P. Sellers and others
Plaintiff: Glicenia C. Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velazquez v. Massachusetts Financial Services Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv11249
Defendant: Massachusetts Financial Services Company Retirement Committee, John Does 1-30, Massachusetts Financial Services Company and others
Plaintiff: Melissa Velazquez and Frances Fuentes-Noriega
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Haberman v. MFS Investment Management We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv11861
Plaintiff: Lawrence Alan Haberman
Defendant: MFS Investment Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $304,041.01 on Deposit at Citi We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3574
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Claimant - Appellant: Daniel Bonventre and Barbara Bonventre
Defendant: $304,041.01 on Deposit at Citibank, N.A., Approximately $297,000 on Deposit at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, One 2005 Bentley Continental, Vin SCBCR63W15C025200, Florida Vehicle Reg. No. PDF5C and others
United States of America v. $304,041.01 on Deposit at Citi
as 11-3838
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Claimant - Appellant: Daniel Bonventre and Barbara Bonventre
Defendant: $304,041.01 on Deposit at Citibank, N.A., Approximately $297,000 on Deposit at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, One 2005 Bentley Continental, Vin SCBCR63W15C025200, Florida Vehicle Reg. No. PDF5C and others
Defendant - Appellant: Up to at Least $233,975 held on deposit at Citibank, N.A. Account No. 9982584826, in the name of Barbara G. Bonventre, All Funds and Other Property held in Chase Investment Account No. CM7-304867, in the name of Daniel and Barbara Bonventre, All Funds and Other Property held on Deposit in JPMorgan Chase Account No. 936-03166746-2 in the name of minor no. 1, Minor Barbara Bonventre, Custodian Under UTMA and others
United States of America v. $304,041.01 on Deposit at Citibank, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv04858
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $304,041.01 on Deposit at Citibank, N.A., Approximately $297,000 on Deposit at Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, One 2005 Bentley Continental, Vin SCBCR63W15C025200, Florida Vehicle Reg. No. PDF5C and others
Claimant: Annette Bongiorno, Rudy Bongiorno and Hudson City Savings Bank
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Smith v. MFS Investment Management et al
as 1:2008cv11942
Plaintiff: Christine A. Smith
Defendant: MFS Investment Management, MFS Investment Management, MFS Investment Management and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?