Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv05578
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Commissioner Tyrone Oliver, Randy Sauls and others
Amicus Curiae:
United States, Network for Victim Recovery of DC (NVRDC) and ACLU of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DICKSON v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC
as 5:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Shicala Dickson
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC and CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ROBINSON v. CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC
as 4:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ROBINSON
Defendant:
CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC and MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Webber v. Fort et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Karl Fort, Georgia Department of Corrections, Georgia Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FRAZIER v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
DENISE FRAZIER
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC doing business as CENTURION PROFESSIONALS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
