Cases 1 - 10 of 10
McKinley Kelly v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 24-1157
Plaintiff:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Defendant:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor, SAMUEL BYRD, NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Charles Justise, Sr. v. Michael Mitcheff
as 23-2735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. JUSTISE, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor
Daniel Crone v. Bruce Ippel, et al
as 23-1387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL CRONE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRUCE IPPEL, Doctor, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and others
Thomas Tracy v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 22-2943
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS DUANE TRACY
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, PAUL A. TALBOT, Doctor, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and others
Jerry Wright v. Wexford of Indiana, LLC, et al
as 22-2555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor
William Hubbard v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 22-1578
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. HUBBARD
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and KIM HOBSON
Terry Huspon v. Michael Mitcheff, et al
as 22-1551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRY W. HUSPON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor, MARTIAL KNIESER, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Christopher Johnson v. Sheri Wilson, et al
as 21-1709
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor, RACHEL HOUGHTON, Nurse Practitioner, individual and in their official capacity, DUAN PIERCE, Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER M. JOHNSON
Jose Arce v. Jennifer Barnes, et al
as 15-3276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE CARLOS ARCE
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNIFER BARNES, as a private individual, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and CORIZON, LLC, Indiana Department of Corrections as real party in interest
James Bowman v. Edwin Buss, et al
as 09-4139
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. BOWMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWIN G. BUSS, BRETT MIZE, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, Doctor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
