Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cherry v. Meyers et al
as 2:2023cv00879
Plaintiff: Michael Tyrone Cherry, Jr.
Defendant: Freddrick Meyers and Officer Baiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry v. Myers et al
as 2:2021cv00699
Plaintiff: Michael Tyrone Cherry, Jr.
Defendant: Frederick Myers and FNU Baiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker et al v. JRCL, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00018
Plaintiff: Lawton Walker and Kristen Walker
Defendant: Marion D. Buck, JRCL, Inc. and Michael K. Cherry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bailey v. Tyrell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00208
Defendant: Justice Michael A. Cherry, Charles Thompson, Tao and others
Plaintiff: Anthony Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00763
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
John Arpino v. Michael Cherry, et al
as 18-16020
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL A. CHERRY, MARK GIBBONS, JAMES W. HARDESTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-15918
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Arpino v. USDC-NVR
as 18-71228
: In re: JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO
Petitioner: JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO, AKA Johnny Bullets
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, RENO
Real Party In Interest: MICHAEL A. CHERRY, MARK GIBBONS, JAMES W. HARDESTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00162
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
John Arpino v. Michael Cherry, et al
as 18-15616
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN FRANCIS ARPINO
Defendant - Appellee: MICHAEL A. CHERRY, MARK GIBBONS, JAMES W. HARDESTY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?