Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Shawn Walker v. Michael Farnan, et al
as 15-1390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN T. WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. FARNAN, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI and others
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 12-2238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Amicus - Appellee:
N. G. BARTLEY
James Paluch, Jr. v. Jeffery Beard, et al
as 10-1645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. PALUCH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERY BEARD, JOHN S. SHAFFER, WILLIAM D. SPRENKLE and others
Debtor - Appellee:
DENNIS P. DURANT
Paluch v. Beard et al
as 1:2009cv01522
Plaintiff:
James A. Paluch, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, John S. Shaffer, William D. Sprenkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYRONE-ANTHONY et al v. KNAUER et al
as 2:2009cv02796
Plaintiff:
TYRONE-ANTHONY, SANDRA HASSETE and WANDA DENISE HUNT
Defendant:
JULIE KNAUER, ARIAS, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Farnan v. David Parman, et al
as 08-2714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Paul Farnan
Defendant - Appellee:
David Parman, Atty., Richard Jacoby, Atty., Frederick Ernst, P.D. and others
Farnan v. Parman et al
as 5:2008cv06059
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Farnan
Defendant:
David Parman, Richard Jacoby, Frederick Ernst and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WALKER v. FARNAN et al
as 2:2007cv04977
Plaintiff:
SHAWN T. WALKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. FARNAN, JEFFERY A. BEARD, DAVID DIGUGLIELMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBUS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2007cv00820
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JOSEPH ROBUS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, BARRY N. KRAMER, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
