Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Singleton v. The State of South Carolina et al
as 2:2019cv02064
Petitioner:
Michael A Singleton
Respondent:
The State of South Carolina and The Commonwealth of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SINGLETON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03482
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. SINGLETON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singleton v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
Michael John Singleton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Michael Singleton v. USA
as 17-15487
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JERNARD SINGLETON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Singleton v. United States Of America
as 4:2017cv00193
Petitioner:
Michael Jernard Singleton
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Singleton v. Garcia et al
as 4:2016cv00172
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
Adrian Garcia and Jaquelin Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jabril Battle
as 12-14916
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JABRIL BATTLE, a.k.a. Kevin Jerard Conard, a.k.a. Michael Antonio Singleton, a.k.a. Gilbert J Jackson, a.k.a. Vincent Jae Larue, a.k.a. Kevin G Conrad, a.k.a. Neal Joppson, a.k.a. Gebrael Den Atun El, a.k.a. G. D. Atun
Singleton v. Byers et al
as 9:2012cv01294
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Singleton
Defendant:
William Byers, B. Mckie, W. Eggleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Eagleton
as 2:2012cv02339
Petitioner:
Michael A Singleton
Respondent:
Warden Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singleton v. 10 unwarranted U.S. Marshal ET AL. et al
as 1:2012cv03960
Defendant:
10 unwarranted U.S. Marshal ET AL., Ms. J.D. Austin, Mr. T.M. Cain and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
