Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SCUTERI v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
CHRISTINE REAGLE, RAINES, PHEGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. CENTURION SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
CENTURION SERVICES and PABLO PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. ARAMARK SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
ARAMARK SERVICES and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCUTERI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GLOBAL*TEL LINK aka VIA PATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. ZATECKY
as 2:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCUTERI v. BURTON et al
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
AMANDA K BURTON, JOHN A LARSON, GREG GRIMMET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCUTERI v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CENTURION SERVICES, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
