Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Davis v. USA
as 5:2021cv00464
Petitioner:
Michael E. Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. USA
as 5:2020cv02184
Petitioner:
Michael E. Davis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Michael Davis
as 19-3652
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hugler v. Davis-Paige Management Systems, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00497
Plaintiff:
Edward C. Hugler
Defendant:
Davis-Paige Management Systems, LLC, Michael E. Davis and Davis-Paige Management Systems 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Michael Davis, et al v. City of Philadelphia
as 15-2937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GLOBAL SALES CALL CENTER LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. DAVIS
as 5:2015cv00494
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2014cv06979
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS and GLOBAL SALES CALL CENTER, LLC
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00850
Plaintiff:
Michael E Davis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
NCAA v. USDC-CAOAK
as 14-71522
:
In re: NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Petitioner:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
SAMUEL MICHAEL KELLER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, EDWARD C. O'BANNON, Jr., BRYON BISHOP and others
DAVIS v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
as 2:2012cv05943
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. DAVIS
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
