Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Antley v. Aiken County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv06890
Plaintiff:
Derek Clark Antley
Defendant:
Aiken County Sheriff's Department, Andrew L. Busbee, Michael Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hunt v. Reagle et al
as 3:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunt
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, David Liebel, Andrew Pazera and others
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Reagle et al
as 3:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunt
Defendant:
Christina Reagle, David Liebel, Andrew Pazera and others
Not Classified By Court:
PUTNAMVILLE E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. BCCX et al
as 4:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunt
Defendant:
BCCX, Aramart Food Services, TDOC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blitchington v. Hunt et al
as 1:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Christopher Eugene Blitchington
Defendant:
Michael Hunt and Amber Magee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manuel v. Hunt et al
as 4:2021cv00596
Plaintiff:
Carlton L Manuel, Jr
Defendant:
Michael Hunt and David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Hunt v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 21-55310
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. BECK, in his individual and official capacity, MATTHEW M. JOHNSON, in his individual and official capacity, DOES, 1-10 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL HUNT
Manuel v. Hunt
as 4:2021cv00154
Petitioner:
Carlton L Manuel, Jr
Respondent:
Michael Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUNT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv84586
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
