Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Michael Morris
as 24-1076
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Morris
Michael Morris v. United States
as 24-1078
Plaintiff:
Michael Morris
Defendant:
United States of America
Longwood Auto, LLC et al v. Torres et al
as 6:2023cv02158
Plaintiff:
Longwood Auto, LLC and Michael Morris
Defendant:
Gerardo Torres and CMG Auto and Tire Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gronskei v. Morris et al
as 3:2023cv08553
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Dawn Gronskei
Defendant:
Kenneth Michael Morris, Justina Morris, Rusty Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AERO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv12647
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MORRIS and THE ESTATE OF HAROLYN MORRIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morris v. USA
as 0:2023cv02173
Petitioner:
Michael Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
