Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Delilah El v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-1697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Defendant:
TOM WOLF, MICHAEL NUTTER, JIM KENNEY and others
EL v. WOLF et al
as 2:2021cv02520
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, JIYA RABEVETSKY, GOEHRING, RUTTER, AND BOEHM and others
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Durden et al
as 8:2019cv00610
Defendant:
Michael Nutter, Wayne M. Durden, Brian Haas and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L. Davis, P.M.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GREENE v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv05444
Plaintiff:
JOHN GREENE
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN THOMAS, MARVIN GRAAF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Bush v. Department of Human Services, et al
as 16-2110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD BUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SAINT VINCENTS SHELTER and others
GRYCZEWSKI et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
PRZEMYSLAW GRYCZEWSKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, MICHELLE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAIN v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv05524
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS CAIN
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA and JOHN DELANEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald Bush v. Department of Human Services, et al
as 15-3016
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERALD BUSH
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET. AL., MAYOR MICHAEL NUTTER and others
THE NORTH WEST AMEXEM, FEZ PROVINCE et al v. WOLF et al
as 2:2015cv03606
Plaintiff:
DELILAH PASSE EL, R.LYNN HATSHEPSUT MA'ATKARE EL, NANYA AMIR EL and others
Defendant:
TOM WOLF , KATHLEEN KANE , MICHAEL NUTTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PARKER v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2015cv02213
Plaintiff:
JASON PARKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, LOUIS GIORLA, M. FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
