Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BRENNER v. OVERMEYER et al
as 3:2022cv00157
Petitioner:
Ian Brenner
Respondent:
Michael Overmeyer, Josh Shapiro and District Attorney of York County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRENNER v. OVERMEYER et al
as 1:2021cv00335
Petitioner:
IAN BRENNER
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, JOSH SHAPIRO and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF YORK COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. OVERMEYER
as 2:2021cv00645
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Petitioner:
JAMIE M. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEYES v. OVERMEYER et al
as 2:2017cv05312
Petitioner:
MALCOLM KEYES
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEYES v. OVERMEYER et al
as 1:2017cv00262
Petitioner:
MALCOLM KEYES
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CASH v. OVERMEYER et al
as 2:2017cv00047
Petitioner:
ROBERT L. CASH
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLLINS v. OVERMEYER et al
as 2:2016cv05457
Petitioner:
MALIK COLLINS
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PEAY v. SAGER et al
as 1:2016cv00130
Plaintiff:
STRATTON PEAY
Defendant:
SAGER, BERRY, SMAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. OVERMEYER et al
as 1:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER, J.A. HORTON, D.F. OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. OVERMEYER
as 2:2016cv00222
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS BAILEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL OVERMEYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
