Cases 1 - 10 of 184
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
as 24-5077
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center and others
Gorbey v. Warden
as 24-2155
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Respondent:
WARDEN, USP Coleman 1
Gorbey v. Sickle, et al.
as 24-2145
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY and Michael Steven Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
SICKLE, Associate Warden, USP Victorville Cal., GORE, Mr., First Name Unknown, Captain USP Victorville, Cal., JOHN DOE, SIS Staff, USP Victorville Cal. and others
In re: Michael Gorbey
as 24-1259
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024fp00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Michael S Gorbey v. Larado et al
as 2:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant:
Mr. Larado, Mr. Gomez, John Doe A-W Programs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owl Feather- Gorbey v. District of Columbia et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather- Gorbey, Michael S. Gorbey and Tsunami Khan
Defendant:
District of Columbia, D.C Circuit Federal Courts, 2nd Circuit Federal Courts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Lammer
as 23-3344
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee:
THOMAS BERGAMI, Warden and BRIAN LAMMER, Warden
Michael S. Gorbey v. Warden, USP Coleman 1
as 2:2023cv10043
Petitioner:
Michael S. Gorbey and Michael Steven Owl Feather -Gorbey
Respondent:
Warden, USP Coleman 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
