Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Keefer et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Representative Dawn Keefer, Representative Timothy Bonner, Representative Barry Jozwiak and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Josh Shapiro, Al Schmidt and others
Amicus Curiae:
Foundation for Government Accountability
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. LAMONT et al
as 3:2023cv21174
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
NED LAMONT, JOHN CARNEY, CHARLIE BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monighan et al v. Christopher et al
as 1:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Monighan, Brodie Monighan, Lydia Monighan and others
Defendant:
David E. Christopher, Gregory Millbrand, Chad Runkel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOHN v. CARDONA et al
as 2:2022cv03535
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MOHN
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
SULEIMAN v. CARDONA et al
as 2:2022cv00736
Plaintiff:
ELLEN SULEIMAN
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA and THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL STUDENT AID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
MOHN v. CARDONA et al
as 2:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MOHN
Defendant:
MIGUEL CARDONA and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Cianfrani v. Cardona et al
as 2:2021cv01757
Defendant:
Miguel Cardona, FMS Investment Corp., DR. Miguel Cardona and others
Plaintiff:
Mark P Cianfrani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
CARDONA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv01404
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES
Plaintiff:
CARDONA and MIGUEL CARDONA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57617
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL CARDONA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
