Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Hill v. Dr. Kohut et al
as 6:2016cv00090
Plaintiff:
Richard Junious Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Dr. Kohut, Dr. Henderson, Officer Rowlen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Fender et al
as 6:2016cv00084
Petitioner:
D'Wayne Bailey
Respondent:
Douglas Fender, Attorney General of the State of Montana, Steve Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Myotte et al
as 6:2016cv00058
Plaintiff:
Stacy G. Hall
Defendant:
Buddy Myotte, Alvin Fode, Trisdan Kohut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chyatte v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv00042
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Chyatte
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Mike Batista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chyatte v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
Douglas J. Chyatte
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Mike Batista and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canda v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 4:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Edward Canda
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Montana Department of Corrections, David Berkebile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devon v. Batista et al
as 6:2016cv00029
Petitioner:
Johnny Devon
Respondent:
Mike Batista and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Batista et al
as 4:2016cv00024
Petitioner:
D'Wayne Bailey
Respondent:
Mike Batista, Leroy Kirkegard, Douglas Fender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. Kirkegard et al
as 4:2016cv00022
Plaintiff:
D'Wayne Bailey
Defendant:
Mike Batista, Berdecia Rodriguez, Dodins-Odegard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cagey v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2016cv00017
Defendant:
Leroy Kirkegard, C/O Marthaler, Mike Batista and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cagey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
