Cases 1 - 3 of 3
The Wilderness Society, et al v. Gene Terland, et al
as 11-35821
Plaintiff:
MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit organization
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, FRIENDS OF THE MISSOURI BREAKS MONUMENT, NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE R. TERLAND, on his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management's Montana State Office, ROBERT ABBEY, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
MISSOURI RIVER STEWARDS, FERGUS COUNTY, PHILLIPS COUNTY and others
Montana Wilderness Association, et al v. Gene Terland, et al
as 11-35818
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTANA WILDERNESS ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit organization
Plaintiff:
THE WILDERNESS SOCIETY, FRIENDS OF THE MISSOURI BREAKS MONUMENT, NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION and others
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE R. TERLAND, on his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management's Montana State Office, ROBERT ABBEY, in his official capacity as Director of the Bureau of Land Management, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, an agency of the United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
MISSOURI RIVER STEWARDS, FERGUS COUNTY, PHILLIPS COUNTY and others
Montana Wilderness Association v. Connell et al
as 4:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Montana Wilderness Association , The Wilderness Society , Friends of the Missouri Breaks Monument and others
Defendant:
Gene R. Terland , Mike Pool , Bureau of Land Management and others
Intervenor:
Recreational Aviation Foundation and Montana Pilots Association
Intervenor_defendant:
Missouri River Stewards , Fergus County , Phillips County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
