Cases 1 - 8 of 8
In Re DMCA Section 512 (h) Subpoena to Cloudflare, Inc.
as 2:2019mc00006
Petitioner:
MKH Inc.
Respondent:
Cloudflare, Inc.
In Re:
In Re DMCA Section 512 (h) Subpoena to Cloudflare, Inc.
In Re: DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to Cloudflare, Inc.
as 2:2018mc00167
Petitioner:
MKH Inc.
Respondent:
Cloudflare, Inc.
In Re:
DMCA Section 512(h) Subpoena to Cloudflare, Inc.
Peace v. Quinn et al
as 2:2014cv01590
Plaintiff:
Daniel Anthony Peace
Defendant:
Kathleen M Quinn, Basil M Loeb, Stephen Sargent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv62363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
TORRES v. CLEANNET U.S.A., INC. et al
as PAE/2:14-cv-02818
Plaintiff:
EDDY TORRES
Defendant:
CLEANNET U.S.A., INC. , MKH SERVICES, INC. and CLEANNET SYSTEMS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
TORRES v. CLEANNET U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2014cv02818
Plaintiff:
EDDY TORRES
Defendant:
CLEANNET U.S.A., INC. , MKH SERVICES, INC. and CLEANNET SYSTEMS OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Contract Dispute
Hayes et al v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority et al
as 1:2012cv00578
Plaintiff:
Michael Hayes and MKH Construction
Defendant:
Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority , Stanley Fernandez , Russell Sciandra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plumbers & Pipefitters Welfare Fund Board of Trustees of the et al v. Matrix Plumbing and Heating Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00414
Plaintiff:
Local No 172 Plumbers & Pipefitters Welfare Fund Board of Trustees of the, Local No 172 Plumbers & Pipefitters Welfare Fund Board of Trustees of the, Local No 172 Plumbers & Pipefitters Welfare Fund Board of Trustees of the and others
Defendant:
Matrix Plumbing and Heating Inc, MKH Mechanical Inc, Joseph Laskowski and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
