Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Allied World National Assurance Company v. NHC, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00469
Defendant:
NHC, Inc. also known as MNS, Ltd. doing business as ABC Stores and MNS, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Allied World National Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv09167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
United States Fire Insurance Company v. Pacific Coffee, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00436
Defendant:
Pacific Coffee, Inc. a Hawaii corporation doing business as Maui Coffee Company and MNS Ltd.
Plaintiff:
United States Fire Insurance Company and The North River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Flores v. MNS, Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv00159
Defendant:
MNS, Ltd., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Unigroup Wholesale Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leah Flores
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bond et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00305
Defendant:
Pacific Coffee Inc, Cameron's Coffee and Distribution Company, MNS LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Morris and Michael Bond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corker et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00290
Plaintiff:
Melanie Bondera, Colehour Bondera, Robert Smith and others
Defendant:
Cameron's Coffee and Distribution Company, Gold Coffee Roasters, Inc., Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Buchalter PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mungchi, Inc. v. MNS, Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv02977
Plaintiff:
Mungchi, Inc.
Defendant:
MNS, Ltd., MNS, Ltd., All 4 Fancy, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Violation of Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
