Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Courchevel 1850 LLC v. Koznitz I LLC
as 23-7263
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COURCHEVEL 1850 LLC
Defendant:
MOHAMED ALAM, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Internal Revenue Service), NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KOZNITZ I LLC
Alam et al v. Hiller et al
as 1:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Alam and Jhonatan Mondragon
Defendant:
Amanda Hiller, Agent Dunn, Agent Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv07069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00167
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alam et al v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00022
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Alam, Roger Buraimoh, Frederico Ornelas and others
Defendant:
Bavarian Motor Works and BMW of North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Rios v. 151 Bleecker LLC et al
as 1:2018cv07287
Defendant:
Mohammed Alam, 151 Bleecker LLC and Andrew Breslin
Plaintiff:
Felipe Martinez Rios
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Alam v. O & S General Contractor Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv02069
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Alam
Defendant:
Omar Mohamed, NFN Babul and O & S General Contractor Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Courchevel 1850 LLC v. Alam et al
as 1:2017cv00785
Defendant:
Mohammed Alam, Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Citibank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Courchevel 1850 LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191 Bank Foreclosure
THOMPSON v. ALAM et al
as 2:2015cv00069
Plaintiff:
DESIREE THOMPSON
Defendant:
MOHAMMED ALAM and HI BOMBAY INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-555
Appellee USA:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
