Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Sandtoro Pearson v. Lee Arrendale State Prison, et al
as 21-10708
Defendant / Appellee:
WENDY ROYAL, MONICA HILL and JILL KENNY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SANDTORO E. PEARSON
Mitchell v. Humphrey et al
as 4:2018cv00181
Defendant:
FNU McGaba, FNU Harvey, Timothy Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
Karl C. Mitchell
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Gabriel Illa, FNU Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2017cv00112
Plaintiff:
Keisha Williams
Defendant:
Kathleen Kennedy, G.C.H.C., Heather Bussell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez De Mosqueda et al v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Maria L. Rodriguez De Mosqueda and Armando Mosqueda Rodriguez
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections , Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia , Georgia Regents University and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Crickmar et al
as 4:2015cv00196
Plaintiff:
Cedric D. Lewis
Defendant:
Scott Crickmar, Georgia Department of Corrections, Homer Bryson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolley v. Bryson et al
as 4:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Darnell Nolley
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Gregory C. Dozier, Ricky Myrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagwell v. Georgia Regents University et al
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
Joseph Paul Bagwell
Defendant:
Georgia Regents University, Dr. Fowlks, Dr. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. Owens et al
as 4:2014cv00290
Plaintiff:
Shawn Singleton
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Timothy C. Ward, Clay Tatum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
