Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Chang v. Bailey et al
as 1:2025cv01330
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Chang, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden William Bailey, Capt Foxwell, Lt. Gattis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Brown et al
as 9:2025cv02616
Plaintiff:
Vernon Samuel Brown
Defendant:
Ms. Brown, Ms. Hickson and Mr. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SEPULVEDA v. MS. KELLY et al
as 2:2025cv00804
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. SEPULVEDA
Defendant:
MS. KELLY, MS. PARADISE, MS. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULTON v. FOSTON et al
as 5:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
350621 RANDALL FULTON
Defendant:
MS MOSELEY, MS BONNER, JEREMY FOSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Brown et al
as 2:2024cv03429
Plaintiff:
Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant:
Sherisse Birch, Ms. Brown and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sosa v. Browning et al
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Oscar Sosa
Defendant:
Ms. Browning, Ms. Stout and Unknown Corrections Officers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cora v. Westhab Homeless Shelter et al
as 1:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Cora
Defendant:
Westhab Homeless Shelter, Mr. Grant and Ms. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anthony Custer v. Jason Green, et al
as 24-1013
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH CUSTER
Defendant:
JASON GREEN, CO-TRUSTEE OR CURRENT OCCUPANT, TIM REARDON, CO-TRUSTEE OR CURRENT OCCUPANT, GEORGE SOLIS and others
Rush Holt, III v. Ms. Brown
as 23-7296
Plaintiff:
RUSH JACK SAMUEL HOLT, III
Defendant:
MS. BROWN, PREA Investigator Sergeant
HAWKINS v. OLIVER et al
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE HAWKINS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT OLIVER, SUPERINTENDENT OVERMYER, MS. SENZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
