Cases 1 - 9 of 9
(HC) Zulu v. Mule Creek Prison et al
as 2:2025cv00906
Petitioner:
Majestic Zulu
Respondent:
Mule Creek Prison, Warden, Accounting Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cross v. Attorney General of the State of California, et al.
as 25-241
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFICE, SACRAMENTO COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Plaintiff:
Arcion and GEORGE EUGENE CROSS
(PC) Zulu v. Mule Creek Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv01892
Defendant:
A.W. Hobbs, Clay, Mule Creek Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Majestic Zulu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Krpin, et al.
as 24-1224
Plaintiff:
ERNEST LEE COX, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN KRPIN, Doctor and MULE CREEK PRISON
Mitchell v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 23-3811
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, J. BENEVIDAZ, Warden, PATRICK COVELLO, Warden and others
(PC) Mitchell v. CDCR et al
as 2:2022cv02232
Plaintiff:
Ronald Mitchell
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the State of California, Mule Creek Prison, J Benevidaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Wren v. Mule Creek Prison et al
as 2:2021cv00903
Defendant:
Warden Avenal State Prison, Warden Mule Creek Prison, Captain Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Charles Wren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Wren v. Mule Creek Prison et al
as 1:2021cv00806
Defendant:
Warden Avenal State Prison, Warden Mule Creek Prison, Captain Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Charles Wren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kabede v. Pleasant Valley State Prison Warden, et al.
as 1:2015cv00635
Plaintiff:
Wondiyrad Kabede
Defendant:
Mule Creek Prison Warden, J. Lizarraga and Pleasant Valley State Prison Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
