Cases 1 - 10 of 50
MYERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00534
Petitioner:
SIMON MYERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Barlow v. US
as 22-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM E. BARLOW, TWILA L. BARLOW, REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Bridges v. US
as 22-1140
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT BRIDGES, MARK COTE, JOSHUA FISH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Unichem Laboratories, Ltd.
as 20-2258
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA USA INC., SIGMAPHARM LABORATORIES, LLC, UNICHEM LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SUNSHINE LAKE PHARMA CO. LTD. and HEC PHARM USA INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and PFIZER INC.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Sunshine Lake Pharma Co. Ltd.
as 20-2252
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA USA INC., HEC PHARM USA INC., SIGMAPHARM LABORATORIES, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNICHEM LABORATORIES, LTD.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and PFIZER INC.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Sigmapharm Laboratories
as 20-2229
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA USA INC. and ACCORD HEALTHCARE INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
SIGMAPHARM LABORATORIES, LLC, HEC PHARM USA INC., UNICHEM LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and PFIZER INC.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute v. Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
as 19-2050
Defendant / Appellant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., TASUKU HONJO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC.
MYERS v. USA
as 1:2015cv00129
BUCKMAN GARDENS, L.P. et al v. USA
as 1:1997cv05837
Plaintiff:
BUCKMAN GARDENS, L.P. , CLARENCE W. GOSNELL, JR. , JOHN G. GOSNELL and others
Defendant:
USA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
