Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BEY v. TYLER et al
as 1:2022cv02334
Plaintiff:
LYN MAGEE BEY
Defendant:
JOSHUA TYLER, STEVEN HALL, HELEN W. MARCHAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STEPHENS v. ELDRIDGE
as 1:2022cv01473
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEPHENS
Defendant:
MYLA ELDRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOTEP-EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01567
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., JOE HOGSETT, DAVID ZIEMBA and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PULLINS v. ELDRIDGE et al
as 1:2020cv01311
Defendant:
MYLA ELDRIDGE, MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD, MARION COUNTY CLERK and others
Plaintiff:
PIERRE Q. PULLINS
SCHMITZ et al v. MARION COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv03314
Defendant:
MYLA ELVIDGE, MARION COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, CONNIE LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
JUAN RAMOS, ANNA SVEC, JOHN M. SCHMITZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANKH-EL v. HOFFMEISTER et al
as 1:2019cv00114
Defendant:
BRIAN HOFFMEISER, CURRENT OWNER AND/OR TENANT OF 2401 WEST 39TH STREET, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46208, JANE A. SEIGEL and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANKH-EL v. HOFFMEISTER et al
as 1:2018cv03497
Defendant:
CURRENT OWNER AND/OR TENANT OF 2401 WEST 39TH STREET, INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46208, JANE A. SEIGEL, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEWART v. MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD et al
as 1:2018cv01487
Defendant:
MYLA ELDRIDGE, MARION COUNTY ELECTION BOARD and STEVEN ROSE
Plaintiff:
ROBBIN STEWART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MAN v. LAWRENCE et al
as 1:2015mc00113
Defendant:
THE HONORABLE SARAH EVANS BARKER, CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
