Cases 1 - 10 of 270
PD v. Sampson et al
as 2:2024cv10894
Plaintiff:
P. D.
Defendant:
James Sampson, Tamara L. Spencer, Carolyn Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Roscoe et al
as 2:2024cv10892
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kale K Roscoe, Jr., Lisa E Roscoe, William T O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens
Poronto v. Hoist et al
as 4:2024cv10522
Plaintiff:
Andrew Poronto
Defendant:
T.D. Hoist, Sarah Breen, Kenneth Debus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly Blunt v. City of Roseville, MI, et al
as 24-1136
Plaintiff:
KELLY AMBER BLUNT
Defendant:
CITY OF ROSEVILLE, MI, et al. and MACOMB COUNTY, MI
Macomb County, Michigan v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Macomb County, Michigan
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Legal Real Estate, LLC et al v. Macomb
as 2:2024cv10278
Plaintiff:
Legal Real Estate, LLC and Madilyn Greiner
Defendant:
The County Of Macomb and Macomb, County of
Interested Party:
Thomas A Fox
West Virginia Laborers Pension Trust Fund v. The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
West Virginia Laborers Pension Trust Fund
Defendant:
The Estee Lauder Companies Inc., Fabrizio Freda and Tracey T. Travis
Petitioner:
Macomb County Employees Retirement System, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund and Wayne County Employees Retirement System
Howard v. Macomb, County of
as 1:2023cv12595
Plaintiff:
Faytima Howard and Faytima Leak
Defendant:
Macomb County and Macomb, County of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Wojt v. Trump et al
as 2:2023cv12454
Plaintiff:
Darryl J. Wojt
Defendant:
Donald Trump, Melania Trump, Federal Agencies and Military and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
