Cases 1 - 10 of 66
GREEN v. JEFFERSON et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
TYRONE GREEN
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN JEFFERSON, DEPUTY WARDEN JONES, DEPUTY WARDEN McDaniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JORDAN v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
MARCUS JORDAN
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Macon State Prison
as 1:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jordan
Defendant:
Macon State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. FEDERAL BEREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LOVE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MACON STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. MACON STATE PRISON, et al
as 5:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LOVE
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON, WARDEN MCDANIEL, SPECIAL AGENT WILLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 1:2023cv05174
Petitioner:
DAVIOUS TAYLOR
Respondent:
Macon State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 1:2023cv05166
Petitioner:
DAVIOUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
Macon State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. MACON STATE PRISON
as 5:2023cv00405
Petitioner:
DAVIOUS TAYLOR
Respondent:
MACON STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROXTON v. MACON STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
SHAKEEM ANTONIO BROXTON
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON, SGT BREANNA INGRAM and LT NICHOLSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMERSON v. OLIVER
as 5:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER AMERSON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, UNIT MANAGER CHARLES HUDSON, DEPUTY WARDEN DERRICK MCDANIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
