Cases 1 - 10 of 122
Eudaley v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Tracie Eudaley
Defendant:
Paul Hopkins, Ryan Wells, Ashley Lepold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Pennington et al v. Hefner et al
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Bryan O Pennington, Tylla Pennington, B.P., 2 and others
Defendant:
Carl Hefner, Stoddard County, Rodger Seal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Alana Phillips v. Carlos Rocha, et al
as 23-3139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member, Michael Myers, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member, Leon Philpot, Mena Regional Health System Hospital Commission Member and others
Youngberg v. Long et al
as 4:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Charles Youngberg
Defendant:
Brandon Long, Kyle Dottson, Taylor Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Terranova et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Raymond Terranova, Eric King, Willie Cole Williams and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Maddox v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Christian Maddox
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Maddox v. Krueger
as 6:2022cv03331
Petitioner:
Carl Maddox
Respondent:
J.E. Krueger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Phillips v. Rocha et al
as 2:2022cv02181
Plaintiff:
Alana S. Phillips
Defendant:
Dr. Carlos Rocha, Michael Myers, Leon Philpot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carl Maddox v. United States
as 22-2074
Petitioner / Appellant:
Carl Marquis Maddox
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
