Cases 1 - 10 of 15
R.M.S. Titanic, Incorporated v. US
as 20-1936
Defendant:
D. JAMES BAKER, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, WILLIAM M. DALEY, Secretary of Commerce, United States Department of Commerce, THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, its engines, tackle, apparel, appurtenances, cargo, etc., Located within one (1) nautical mile of a point located at 41 degrees 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 degrees 56' 49" West Longitude, believed to be the RMS TIT and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R.M.S. TITANIC, INCORPORATED, successor in interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership
R.M.S. Titanic, Inc. v. US
as 20-1684
Defendant:
D. JAMES BAKER, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, WILLIAM M. DALEY, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, its engines, tackle, apparel, appurtenances, cargo, etc., Located within one (1) nautical mile of a point located at 41 degrees 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 degrees 56' 49" West Longitude, believed to be the RMS TIT and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R.M.S. TITANIC, INCORPORATED, successor in interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership
Richard Blumenthal, et al v. Donald Trump
as 19-5237
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Amy Klobuchar, Jeff Merkley, Cory A. Booker and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae:
Leonard I. Garth, Judge, Scholar, Rutgers Law School, Frank Greenberg, Tom Harkin, (D-IA) and others
State of Oklahoma, et al v. EPA
as 15-1364
Not Yet Classified:
Catholic Climate Covenant, ; Catholic Rural Life; Evangelical Environmental Network; National Council of Churches USA; Coalition on the Environment and Jewish Life; Church World Service; Union of Reform Judaism; Women of Reform Judaism; National Bapt, Don J. Easterbrook, Gordon J. Fulks and others
Amicus Curiae:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, Loggers Association of Northern California, Boulder County, CO and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality and State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Mike Hunter
Joan Malone v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-5080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joan Frances M. Malone, 2012 U.S. Presidential Canidate (Independent Party)
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State (2008-Present 2012), William J. Clinton, Former U.S. President, George H.W. Bush and others
Joan Malone v. William Clinton, et al
as 10-5406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joan Frances M. Malone
Defendant - Appellee:
William J. Clinton, Former President, Al Gore, Former Vice President, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State and others
Ada Ron-Messer v. National Democrat Party, et al
as 09-5296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ada L. Ron-Messer
Defendant - Appellee:
National Democrat Party, William J. Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Ada Ron-Messer v. National Democrat Party, et al
as 08-5185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ada L. Ron-Messer
Defendant - Appellee:
National Democrat Party, William J. Clinton, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Warren, William A. v. USA, et al
as 00-5130
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William A. Warren
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Bruce C. Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, Madeleine K. Albright, Secretary of State and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 00-5022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor For Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Terminated Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
