Cases 1 - 10 of 258
Mahal v. City Of Chicago
as 1:2024cv01835
Plaintiff:
Tamara Mahal
Defendant:
City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Rodrick Brayboy v. Kullner, et al
as 24-1331
Plaintiff:
RODRICK BRAYBOY
Defendant:
KULLNER, UNIT MANAGER, ZACHARY J. MOSLACK, CHIEF HEARING EXAMINER, APPEALS OFFICE, DAYNORWICZ, PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Brayboy v. Kullner et al
as 1:2023cv01651
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Maurice Brayboy
Defendant:
Kullner, Zachary J. Moslack, Daynorwicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAYBOY v. KULLNER et al
as 2:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
RODRICK MAURICE BRAYBOY
Defendant:
KULLNER, ZACHARY J. MOSLACK, DAYNORWICZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson #287931 v. Davids et al
as 1:2023cv00776
Plaintiff:
Garfield Lawson #287931
Defendant:
John Davids, Hunter Doesberg, Bath DeBoer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Mason et al
as 4:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Taji Lee
Defendant:
B. Mason, Corrections Officer Miller, Corrections Officer Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Mason et al
as 4:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Taji Lee
Defendant:
B. Mason, Correctional Officer Miller, Corrections Officer Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rana v. Rani Mahal Fine Indian Cuisine, Inc. et al
as 7:2023cv01738
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Rana
Defendant:
Rani Mahal Fine Indian Cuisine, Inc. and Abdul Jalil
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MAHALIC v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02822
Plaintiff:
PHILIP MAHALIC
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
