Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burriss et al v. U. S. Supreme Court et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Burriss, Raymond Edwards, Melvin Brinson and others
Defendant:
U. S. Supreme Court, U.S. Grand Jury, U.S. Justice Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deon Starkes v. Crystal Willett
as 22-7339
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEON JOSEPH STARKES
Defendant / Appellee:
CRYSTAL WILLETT, Superintendent, MAJOR WRIGHT, MAJOR ALLEN and others
Starkes v. Willett et al
as 3:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Deon Joseph Starkes
Defendant:
Crystal Willett, Major Wright, Major Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fournier v. Cruethirds et al
as 1:2018cv00300
Defendant:
Ocean Springs Investigator, Unknown Defendant, Richards Daniel and others
Plaintiff:
Beau B. Fournier
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv00096
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Major Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Riddick v. Willett et al
as 3:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Rashad Matthew Riddick
Defendant:
Crystal Willett, Major Wright and L. Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Illinois Dept. of Corr. et al
as 1:2012cv10369
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dean
Defendant:
Illinois Dept. of Corr., Marcus Hardy, Asst. Warden Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Cain et al
as 2:2011cv00652
Plaintiff:
Lacal Lucky Wilson
Defendant:
N. Burl Cain, Major Wright, Captain Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
