Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Holmes, Jr. v. MTC Management Training Corp., et al
as 3:2017cv00812
Plaintiff:
Gerald Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , MTC Medical LLC and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 3:2017cv00811
Plaintiff:
Gerald Holmes, Jr.
Defendant:
MTC Management Training Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gordon v. Van Schoyck et al
as 3:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
Dante' D. Gordon
Defendant:
Robert Van Schoyck, Patrick M. McGrath, Spectrum Reporting LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Management & Training Corp.
as 3:2017cv00503
Plaintiff:
James M. Lee
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaluz v. Management & Training Corp.
as 1:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Adriana Delaluz
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McDowell v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2016cv03086
Plaintiff:
Joseph A McDowell
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , MTC Medical, LLC , Corrections Officer Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soto v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2016cv02993
Plaintiff:
Anthony Soto
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , MTC Medical LLC and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willacy County Local Government Corporation v. Management & Training Corp.
as 1:2016cv00307
Plaintiff:
Willacy County Local Government Corporation
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Management & Training Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv02591
Plaintiff:
Aaron Miller
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , MTC Medical LLC and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanWormer v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2016cv01781
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp. , MTC Medical LLC and John Does
Plaintiff:
Michael VanWormer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
